Jump to content
princess

Charlie Sheen

Recommended Posts

Charlie Sheen

Threatens 'Anger' Producers

Fire Selma Blair ... Or I'll Quit

TMZ

 

Charlie Sheen has told "Anger Management" producers -- FIRE SELMA BLAIR ASAP OR ELSE HE'S QUITTING THE SHOW ... TMZ has learned.

 

We broke the story -- Charlie has been on a mission to get Selma 86'd from the show because he believes she's been complaining about him behind his back ... trashing his work ethic.

 

Now, sources tell TMZ ... Charlie returned to work Monday and told producers he wants the termination process started TODAY ... or else he'll walk.

 

It's a big threat from Charlie -- who's set to make between $75 and $200 MILLION if he completes the 100 episode order for "Anger Management" ... depending on how it does in syndication. We're told Charlie's completed roughly half of the 100 episode order.

 

We're told Charlie understands that there can be complications with firing someone from a TV show ... but he wants producers to begin drawing up an exit strategy for Blair by the end of the day.

 

Sources connected to the production tell us ... Selma was not on set yesterday, though it's unclear if she was scheduled to work.

 

This morning, Blair was spotted out on a walk with her kid -- and when asked about her potential termination from "Anger" she just shook her head and replied, "I don't know anything."

 

We're told FX network execs are currently in talks about how to handle the situation ... but it's unclear if Blair's fate has been decided.

 

 

 

So 'ol Charlie Boy is again biting the hand that feeds him. Anyone wanna guess which network will hire him next when he screws up this gig?!?!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

TMZ

 

Chalk up a victory for Charlie Sheen ... 'cause Selma Blair has officially been 86'd from "Anger Management."

 

TMZ broke the story ... Sheen personally fired Blair over the weekend after hearing that she was complaining about his work ethic behind his back.

 

Sheen then went to producers and issued an ultimatum -- get rid of Selma ... or I quit.

 

Seems producers sided with Charlie -- 'cause Lionsgate, the studio behind the show, just released a statement saying, "We are confirming that Selma Blair will not be returning to Anger Management and we wish her the very best."

 

Read more: http://www.tmz.com#ixzz2Wd0GbcsO

Visit Fishwrapper: http://www.fishwrapper.com

 

 

This is what you call enabling. :rolleyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a shame because the show actually is pretty funny and Selma definitely contributed. She was very good and will be missed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Charlie Sheen

Halfway to $150 Mil Payday

TMZ

 

Charlie Sheen has officially made it halfway to the biggest payday of his life ... $150 million from "Anger Management" ... and no one really thought he'd make it this far.

 

Charlie just wrapped his 50th episode of the show ... a milestone in the broadcast world ... because once "Anger Management" hits 100 episodes, it's eligible for syndication.

 

Syndication -- where a show is packaged and sold off to TV stations around the world -- is where the big bucks are ... and we're told Charlie stands to earn at LEAST $150 million if a syndication deal goes through. It took Charlie nearly 3 times as long to earn the equivalent sum -- $150 mil -- for "Two and a Half Men."

 

Here's the rub. The 100th episode of "Anger Management" is set to film in October, 2014. That gives Charlie well over a year to do that thing he does ... which can sometimes derail a show. But, so far, so good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

TMZ

 

Brooke Mueller just got rejected in court -- a judge has refused to issue a restraining order against Charlie Sheen for allegedly threatening her life last week.

 

Brooke filed the request for a temporary restraining order against Sheen following his anti-Brooke tirade last week (below), when he told "TMZ Live" Brooke is an evil whore who's putting their twins' lives in danger. He said he would be gunning for full custody come hell or high water.

 

In her petition, Brooke quotes Charlie saying, "[T]here will be a reckoning. There will be a whirlwind. That they will all reap while desperate begging for my forgiveness. You've all been warned."

 

And, "I will exercise every resource at my disposal. I will, I will, I will, I will empty my entire war chest and if I can't get it done, I know a guy who can."

For her part, Brooke insists she's maintaining her sobriety and Charlie is on a mission to sabotage her. Brooke says she's even scared Charlie will plant drugs on her.

 

But the judge wasn't buying her case ... he flat out denied her emergency request for a restraining order ... at least for now.

 

The judge set a hearing for next month for Brooke to make her case again in person.

 

 

 

Someone is manic again. :ninja:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Someone is manic again. :ninja:

 

 

Posted Image

 

TMZ

 

Charlie Sheen is killing Brooke Mueller with kindness -- at least he really, really wants to -- because he just wished his ex-wife a happy birthday with a special piece of cake (topped with a grenade).

 

FYI, it's not actually Brooke's birthday (that's in August) but it didn't stop Charlie from writing this message on Twitter, "Happy Bday Brooke. When you're done sucking off the parking lot at Home Depot, why don't ya 'blow' out this candle?"

 

Now that's love.

 

Oh yeah, if you recognize the cake ... that's because it's the same cake Charlie got for his recent "Anger Management" party.

 

The Warlock has returned.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Denise Richards

I Can't Handle Bob and Max

They Torture Dogs and People

Exclusive

TMZ

 

Denise Richards has informed the L.A. County Dept. of Children and Family Services she will NO LONGER care for the twins of Charlie Sheen and Brooke Mueller ... TMZ has learned.

 

Sources connected with DCFS tell TMZ ... Denise wrote a letter to the agency, saying the kids are violent and out of control, and she says it's ALL Brooke's fault.

 

DCFS sources say the letter details horrifying conduct. Denise says Bob and Max often go into a "zombie-like state" -- they repeatedly kick her dogs in the head and squeeze their heads with both hands while watching the dogs whimper in pain. She also says the kids will flip from sweetly petting the dog to strangling the animals and lifting them off the ground by the neck.

 

According to the letter, Denise would tell the kids they were hurting the dogs, and Bob and Max would reply that they wanted to hurt and kill the dogs.

 

According to the letter, the violence is not limited to animals. Denise says her daughters -- Sam, Lola and Eloise -- have been targets of the boys. She says her daughters have been strangled, kicked in the head and stomach, scratched, bit, slapped, punched in the face and head, and spit on by Bob and Max. Denise describes one incident which she seems to blame on Brooke -- after visiting Mueller, Bob threw a toy at Sam's face and she had to go to the doctor.

 

Denise says Bob and Max went to school in September and they have been problematic from the get-go. She says Bob in particular has harmed other kids and punched and slapped teachers in the face.

 

Denise says the kids have also thrown their own feces into the bathroom of one of her daughters.

 

In the letter, Denise connects the bad conduct to the time the kids spend at Brooke's home, claiming they act out violently when they are returned to Denise. She also says the kids have had horrible nightmares after returning from Brooke's home, where the kids would stay up with her til 4 AM.

 

In the long letter to DCFS, Denise -- who has temporary guardianship of the boys while Brooke deals with her drug problems -- says pediatricians have advised her to seek psychological counseling for the boys, but Brooke has blocked that effort.

 

 

:blink:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, those kids are effed.

 

I have to wonder at the timing of Denise's actions - looks like she is supporting Charlie by releasing stuff that makes Brooke look bad. At this point I sort of think they're all assholes but maybe Denise is doing the best she can with the kids at least.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, those kids are effed.

 

I have to wonder at the timing of Denise's actions - looks like she is supporting Charlie by releasing stuff that makes Brooke look bad. At this point I sort of think they're all assholes but maybe Denise is doing the best she can with the kids at least.....

If I had to guess what is actually going on, this is what it would be:

 

Brooke is a mess and still using. Her home environment is not healthy for the kids, especially with dealers and low lifes coming in and out of the house. Obviously the kids are messed up from long-term issues they have had to deal with. Charlie and Denise both know she is using and only make things worse for the boys, and don't think it is in the kid's best interest to have them there.

 

Charlie is phasing up into manic stage again (typical when stressful situations start to happen) and while he thinks he is doing the right thing, in his manic self-righteous haze he is violating the gag order that was put in place by the judge. So even though Charlie may be right that Brooke is no good, his message will get lost by the judge who will only see a guy trying to bully his ex-wife and has his own problems.

 

Denise knows about Brooke still using and Charlie gearing up with his mania. I'm sure Charlie and Brooke had some knock down dragged out fights (how else would the boys learn how to treat others?) and while Denise knows that it's not in the boys best interest to be with Brooke, she also knows Charlie is not the best either. But she has her own girls she needs to protect and she is no longer able to handle the boy's outbursts. Not to mention that she does not have the support of Brooke into getting the boys to seek help, but she prob also doesn't have Charlie's support either because Charlie in his manic self-righteous brain thinks if he takes the boys he can teach them to "see the light" and everything will be honkey dory.

 

So by Denise filing these docs with the judge (even if it "appears" she is taking sides), she can get a legal order to get the boys professional help - something neither Brooke or Charlie would allow on their own. She also now has documents filed with the state showing that they boys are out of control and have anger issues, so if she needs to defend her own girls she can legally show she tried getting professional help but was blocked from doing so. Denise is actually a lot smarter than people give her credit for.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Princess - you stated clearly what I was hazily thinking might be going on- far better than I could.

 

(I still wonder cynically about the timing, but....I agree it's the right thing for Denise to do in any event)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think Denise has any good choices at this point, she's just picking the best of her bad options. If those boys are out of control now, I don't even want to think about what they'll be like when they turn teenagers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I feel sick to my stomach thinking about what those poor boys must have been through in order to be acting like that. How could a person do that to her own kids? And I know Brooke isn't alone - the news is filled with such awful people. I just don't understand :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why is it even Denise's responsibility? Aren't they Charlie's responsibility? Is this guy ever going to grow up?!

Not until he's properly treated.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why is it even Denise's responsibility?

It's not her responsibility but she's doing it because they are her daughter's brothers, their parents are both FUBAR, and she's probably being paid to act as guardian too. Sheen might be severely manic and not able to care for the kids, but he will support them.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sheen might be severely manic and not able to care for the kids, but he will support them.....

TMZ

 

Charlie tells TMZ ... he will not be muzzled by a gag order or any other admonition. He believes his twins Bob and Max have been grievously damaged by their mom, Brooke Mueller and he thinks DCFS is blindly protecting her at his kids' expense.

 

Charlie quotes Martin Sheen in the flick, "I am beyond their timid lying morality, therefore I am beyond caring" -- referring to what he considers the tepid actions of DCFS.

 

Charlie goes on: "What my family and I are forced to deal with in the last 4 years, lives outside the pale of any acceptable conduct or decency. I am battling an amorphous enemy that needs to be swiftly disempowered."

 

As we first reported, Brooke's people are gunning for Charlie for violating the gag order and going on TMZ Live, calling Brooke a "whore" and the world's worst parent. To that he says, "There is no force, no human, and no scenario in the known universe that will divert my course, my mission in this life."

 

As for the pictures TMZ posted, showing Bob allegedly before and after a visit with Brooke -- where it looks like his face was injured -- Charlie says he will stop at nothing to get DCFS to do the right thing:

 

-- "These crimes against my children will be exposed. These war criminals will be hanged at dusk to a cheering and jeering crowd, gathered together in love in support of all children who are mercilessly discarded like garbage by CPS. Which by the way stands for 'CAN'T PROTECT SHITE.'"

 

Charlie ends with an ominous threat: "The storm is brewing. Their roofs are leaking. I am the Tsunami your mommy warned you about your whole childhood. All of you renegade deplorable pigs are marked for slaughter."

 

Read more: http://www.tmz.com#ixzz2jt66GME7

 

 

Posted Image

Edited by princess

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven't had time to read the entire letter yet, but per RadarOnline here is what Denise wrote. Note that Charlie is NOT on board per text I put in red.

 

 

 

With a heavy heart I must inform you that I can no longer be Bob and Max’s caregiver. This has been an extremely difficult decision because I have so much love for the boys. I have always cared for them as if they were my own children. Unfortunately, I have seen them get worse with increased contact with their mom and I am unable to obtain for them proper assessments and professional help. I have seen the boys’ continuing violence towards animals, their sisters and adults. This recent decision means the girl’s can’t continue their relationship with their dad. I believe I have no choice coming to this difficult decision for the reasons I explain below.

 

I know these boys to be very kind and loving. Bob loves to draw and play the drums while Max loves sports. They think of my dad as one of their grandfathers and my youngest daughter Eloise as their sister. They look up to their big sisters and really enjoy Eloise looking up to them.

 

At the time of placement Bob was very anxious, biting his nails. Max was very emotional and aggressive towards his brother. Nighttime was difficult. Prior to placement they didn’t have a bedtime. It was very inconsistent. They were often up until 4am. They had no boundaries, manners, didn’t know how to share, and weren’t respectful of other children. Shortly after placement Bob stopped biting his nails, they learned to play with my daughters and other children, they did very well with a regular bedtime routine. Their school commented on the noticeable positive change. They were very respectful and had good manners. They seemed very calm and content and happy at our home.

 

About two months into it, their visits with their mom were increased and I saw changes. They displayed a violent anger that was uncontrollable. As you are aware NAME REDACTED, their therapist, started working with the children about a month after placement. I gave her a history of their behavior over the 10 months prior to placement and the first month after. The boys adjusted very well right after placement. I voiced my concerns to their therapist. I reminded her that they transitioned on and off prior to placement between the both of us. What I started to see in the boys was very different and disturbing at times.

 

The boys started to have extreme violent mood swings, often times out of nowhere. They would be calm, playing and turn on a dime. The boys would grab anything they could get their hands on as quick as possible. Toys, picture frames, any object within arm’s reach, they can pick up they would throw. They violently threw these things at me, my daughters, anyone near them, as well as at the windows and walls. They have broken iPads, cellphones, flipped small furniture and break it, along with many toys. Bob threw a remote at the tv so hard he cracked the screen. I had to take many things out of their room because they would destroy it. I have had to put things up out of their reach. Things that normally would be appropriate for a 4yr old, have to be put away. After they break things many times they say that I broke them or their sister did. Mine and Charlie’s daughters have been strangled, kicked in the head and stomach, scratched, bit, slapped, punched in the face and head, and spit on. Myself and anyone around them have also experienced this. My daughter Sami had to be taken to the doctor after getting hit in the eye with a toy when Bob came home with from a visit with his mom.

 

The boys have also been waking up with nightmares. Bob wakes up more often than Max, screaming and crying and it’s usually more than once in a night. The nightmares started about two months ago, then went away. Recently they have returned. Bedtime has become incredibly challenging because of the nightmares and Bob especially is very scared to go to sleep.

 

Their aggression is very confusing. They have a very gentle sweet side and in an instant it’s as though a switch is flipped in their mind. They can’t help it when these things happen. The boys will play very kindly with my youngest daughter, and for no reason will knock her in the head or push her over, or pinch her hard and won’t stop. One of the boys picked up a small chair to slam on her head. I was able to stop him. I can’t turn my back on them for a second. When they think I’m not looking they’ll kick our old lab in the face or punch one of us in the head. There was a period of them being fascinated playing with their feces and urinating on our walls. One evening I put them to bed, I was getting their sisters ready for bed. The boys snuck in my youngest daughter’s room while she was asleep and locked the door. I was terrified. They wouldn’t make a sound. They wouldn’t answer me. I couldn’t hear them even though I was calling for them. I had to get Charlie’s security. They broke open the door. The boys were in my daughter’s bathroom, one was pooping in her tub, while the other one was on the toilet catching his own feces and throwing it all over her bathroom.

 

The most concerning behavior is that boys complete detachment from any emotion when they are in the moment inflicting harm on a person or animals. While in these moments they enter a zombie like state. This is their most troublesome behavior myself and others have witnessed. They have expressed their love for our dogs, which are very gentle and kid friendly. They both have repeatedly kicked the dogs in the head, squeezed their heads with both hands while watching the dogs whimper in pain. The boys have choked them, punched them, pressed on their back and head extremely hard. While petting our little dog very sweetly, a second later they had had their hands tight around our dog’s neck and lifted him off the floor while strangling him. While doing this, they showed no remorse or any emotion. Due to their state I can’t get their attention to stop them when they’re inflicting harm. I have to physically pry their hands away. I could wave my hand in front of their face and they won’t flinch. I have repeatedly shared this many, many times to everyone involved in this case. I tell the boys they could kill the dogs strangling them, but have gotten many responses from the boys that they want to hurt them and want them to die. Shortly after they will tell me how much they love the dogs. The examples I have given are a handful of incidences that I have witnessed since having the boys. I realize that the boys have endured a lot and I would imagine the reasons the department removed them from their home have had an effect on them. I am aware that the boys are confused. How could they not be?

 

On a monthly visit with the department, NAME REDACTED said she knew what I was talking about when I expressed my concern of the boys appearing to have a lack of emotional attachment while causing harm. She said that she saw one of the boys almost smiling while he was being aggressively physical. Prior to placement I never witnessed this behavior. I had seen tantrums and aggression, but this is extremely different. I am very worried that they will do severe harm to our other children, themselves or anyone else. Over the summer I had them enrolled in a gymnastics camp, after several tries they were asked to leave. They were hurting other children, slapped the coaches, and their aggression was disruptive in the camp. When the boys started school in September 2013, the head of the school was concerned. She felt that she didn’t recognize the boys that she saw the end of June 2013. The boys have continued to have trouble at school. Bob especially. He harmed other children as well as punching and slapping teachers in the face. The incidents are not everyday. It goes in waves with many ups and downs. This is true at my home, and my understanding is the same for school. However, it only takes one incident for the boys to do extreme harm to another child.

 

As things started to escalate with their tumultuous mood swings and volatile behavior, I went to their pediatrician for help. In August their pediatrician wrote me a letter which is attached to this letter. He expressed his concerns over their behavior and urged me to have them go to a doctor he recommended, NAME REDACTED for a complete development and behavioral assessment. Their dad agreed also. I sent their pediatrician’s letter to the boys attorney and the department. I was given permission to move forward with the assessment. I had a two hour appointment with NAME REDACTED without the boys. During the course of the appointment she explained an assessment was important because she questioned whether the boys’ behaviors were attributable to the transitions. The appointment with the boys was two days later. The day before their appointment with the boys, NAME REDACTED from the department called and informed me the boys’ mother did not want them assessed and I could not take the boys to their appointment. After speaking with the boys’ attorney a week or so later it was explained that their mother would consider moving forward with an assessment, but wanted a doctor that I did not suggest. I reminded him the recommendation came from their pediatrician not myself. NAME REDACTED said someone else mentioned to him that I possibly wanted to take them to a doctor to get them medicated. Medication was never mentioned in any conversation that I had in discussing an assessment or anything else. It was also conveyed to me that their mother and her attorney felt that I was trying to find something wrong with the boys so that she can’t get them back. I have had to defend my position in regards to caring for the boys many times. I have been repeatedly accused of having an agenda. I will remind the department that I have genuine care and love for the boys, they are my daughter’s brothers. I do not get additional child support, their mother has continued to get support during placement. I have no agenda other than the boys’ best interests. As a result, the boys have not been assessed. It’s been about two months that I was informed I am not to take them to their pediatrician, and since then I have not received the name of one that I’m allowed to take them to should need be.

 

With no authority to make decisions on their behalf, I feel my hands are tied in providing them the proper help, support, and care that I feel as a parent they need. Often times their actions create an unsafe environment for themselves, my children, and others around them. There are times I feel that their best interest is being overlooked in this case and as a result I can no longer support this situation. As a parent and person who’s cared for them consistently for the last 7 months since placement and 10 months prior to placement in which they were in my care on and off at their mother’s request, I feel it would be extremely beneficial to get additional professional help for the boys. I have informed everyone involved in this matter that I believe the boys’ current mental health is detrimental to themselves and others around them.

 

I have spent many hours participating in therapy with the boys. I also did family therapy with their mother as requested by their therapist. I personally take care of all of their needs. I take care of the boys when they’re sick. I bought them all new clothes and shoes because they didn’t have any that fit when they were placed with me. Our daughters gave their room to their brothers which we decorated and surprised them with all the things they love. I truly have taken care and loved the boys as my own. My family has done everything to make them feel this is their home and not just a place they are staying. I have seen them feel loved, secure and benefit from the stability in our home.

 

The only agenda that I have is to care for them. That is it. I have no other agenda other than their well being. When I have deep concerns, seeing signs and behaviors indicating something is wrong, I would be irresponsible to not do something.

 

In my opinion I believe there is something deeper going on than difficulties due to transitions. Something in the boys has shifted. It doesn’t happen all the time, there are periods where it can be more often, and times when it’s less often. It’s very up and down. Regardless of how many times it’s happening, when it happens it’s on another level that is actually hard to explain unless witnessing it. I was told it’s normal and to be expected for their situation. I have been regularly told “These things will most likely go away once they’re back full time with their mom. ” I don’t know how this could be expected given her history. I also don’t know how the severity of their behavior can be ignored.

 

As you know Friday evening I received a call from the department that I can no longer monitor the father’s visits with the boys. The reason I was given was because of recent media. The department has previously been very supportive of the boys’ relationship with their father and also felt it was a good idea when he and I made the decision for the children and me to move close to him. As you have been made aware, it was previously very difficult to impossible for him to have a relationship with his sons while they were in the care of their mother. The last 7 months Charlie has been able to go to their school, while he was previously not allowed by their mom. He attended a Father’s Day event with the boys at school, a field trip. He has spent time with us consistently as you’ve seen on the visitation logs. His parents have been able to have a relationship with the boys as well. Janet and Martin Sheen have been very involved since placement. At the time of placement, the department was supportive of me being the monitor for their father even after their mother and lawyer opposed this in court. What may go on in the “media” has nothing to do with what is in the best interest of the boys.

 

Charlie has been off work the last few weeks. During that time he’s taken our daughters to school most days and picked them up, brought breakfast for all of the children, helped with homework, and had dinners with us. I’m also including their father’s final visitation log up to date. Because I have to be his monitor he’s not allowed to take his sons to school. While I am working a nanny has had to take the boys to school instead of their father. Charlie and I both respected the boundaries in place, and there has never been an incident where he has been inappropriate in front of the children. My home is very harmonious and nothing negative has ever been said to or around the boys. I can’t control what the boys may share with me or their father, however, nor should anyone try. Charlie has always remained respectful and supportive about their mother in the presence of the children.

 

I’m now not permitted to have their father in my home while the boys are present, which at this time is almost everyday. I do not believe that is in the best interest of the children.

 

Like Charlie, I have had to endure the boys’ mom’s accusations. I’m including photos that the department and the therapist have seen. I have a photo of what Bob’s face looked like at the time of myself and the boys’ meeting the monitor. From there the monitor took the boys to their mother for a day visit. I will remind the department that the photo the monitor, NAME REDACTED, or their mother took is indicating that Bob’s face looked very different from the time I gave the boys to the monitor. I was very upset by this, their therapist NAME REDACTED was at the visit at the time of arrival and did confirm Bob’s face did not look like the photo that NAME REDACTED had.

 

I was committed and willing to care for the boys and do everything I could to provide for them until their mom gets well. However, given I don’t have permission to get them the care and help they need I’m not able to provide the care that I believe is in their best interest. I have made endless requests for additional psychological help for the boys and explained in detail why. Nothing has happened. This is a very difficult decision to make, but necessary under these circumstances. It’s become unsafe in my home at times with their behavior. I can’t risk anything happening to my daughters or anyone else in my home. For that I have to step aside at this time. I’m here to help make the transition as smooth as possible for everyone involved and hope that my daughters will still maintain their relationship with their brothers as well as myself.

 

Sincerely,

 

Denise Richards

Edited by princess

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a very difficult situation, no doubt. But I am troubled by the fact that I and everyone else am able to read this letter; those children deserve some privacy regardless of how disturbed they are.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I feel VERY dirty for having read that. It is a heartbreaking letter that should not be public information just because their parents are famous. That being said, I did read it, and with regards to the red highlighted section, I don't think it means Charlie is not on board, I think it means that because she's not allowed to have him in the house when the boys are there (which is all the time) because of the change in his supervised visits, it is preventing her daughters from being able to see him.

 

That is really heartbreaking. Poor kids, and I have a hell of a lit of respect for her after reading that letter. She is really trying hard. I don't really give a crap if she was one of Heidi's girls.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That is really heartbreaking. Poor kids, and I have a hell of a lit of respect for her after reading that letter. She is really trying hard. I don't really give a crap if she was one of Heidi's girls.

I agree. After seeing what she's done with ALL the kids over the past few years, she's really gained my respect as well. It's nice the kids have one sane & sober (I hope) voice fighting for them in this.

 

(why is the letter public? Because they wanted to one-up Brooke? Because it is safer to have it public? E, all of the above plus many reasons I can't articulate?)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(why is the letter public? Because they wanted to one-up Brooke? Because it is safer to have it public? E, all of the above plus many reasons I can't articulate?)

I'll be willing to bet someone at Child Protective Services is making a little money on the side by leaking this to the press. My sister works for CPS here in San Diego, the case files to through lots of hands and it would be easy to make copies. Now that I've had time to read the full letter, I agree that with the highlighted red text Denise is saying that Charlie's visitation with his girls is cut off because of the situation with the boys.

 

What a mess. No winners here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I do not get additional child support, their mother has continued to get support during placement.

Interesting. I am sure Charlie is giving her support, but it kills me that their mom gets the child support even though the boys aren't staying with her. Is this normal?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×