BobbyD

Delete.

Amen. :4biggrin:

Is it not perfectly natural for both men and women to wonder (or judge) why someone isn't married or with someone? It's hard for me to believe that most men and women don't normally do it when seeking a potential mate. I think it's normal in society. Me and my buddies said something was up for her to be single. That leaves it open to various reasons( and not just batshit implications, lol)...she doesn't want to be married, dating the wrong people (John Mayer,wtf?), not over Brad, high standards, or can't find a mate. I don't see a problem with those thoughts...because in our male experiences, women often look at us the same way. Usually it's how many kids, why no kids, are you gay, don't want to be married, too broke, etc. No offense taken, but I think it's a normal thing to wonder what's going on. Couldn't that also be looked at as a compliment, when us men see an attractive woman who appears to have it going on and our thoughts drift to that she probably would have no problem getting someone...so what's going on? A lot of women do it to us, trust me. :4biggrin: It's ok, if people think she's doing fine. I'm in the business side...and her numbers don't match that. She's not a draw...and doesn't have a big fanbase to open a flick. People went to Marley & Me, because it's a well known story about a Dog (they could've had anyone in her role). What role has anyone seen of her where they can actually say, she was excellent in it? (Maybe The Good Girl?) I think she should try something else. Not completely sold on with her in Horror, either. Unless she could follow Sara Michelle Gellar or Naomi Watts in those Japanese Horror remakes.

Lindsay Police Report Pokes Holes In Jeweler's Story 2/10/2011 6:08 AM PST by TMZ Staff -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The police report detailing how Lindsay Lohan allegedly stole a $2,500 necklace from an L.A. jewelry store shows two puzzling inconsistencies in the jeweler's story -- inconsistencies that could help Lindsay beat the rap. According to the report, obtained by TMZ, the jeweler first told cops Lindsay had been in the store three times before the alleged theft -- looking at the necklace in question. The next day, the jeweler changed her story and said it was actually a ring Lindsay had been eyeing on previous visits and never looked at the necklace. And there's another inconsistency. According to the report, on January 23, the owner told cops, "The surveillance video revealed that as Kaman [owner] was talking to Lindsay's male friend, Lohan reached up to her neck area with both hands, removed the store necklace, and placed it inside her black Chanel bag." But the next day, the owner changed her story, saying Lindsay walked out of her store with the necklace around her neck. The reason for the inconsistency -- the owner claims she reviewed the video on a different monitor the second time and saw it differently. The jewelry store owner's credibility is crucial because Lindsay claims the owner loaned the necklace to her.

I do hear you(even though I dislike her). I figured she could've gotten something on TV (specifically HBO or Showtime) and have a career like Sarah Jessica Parker. She might've reached a whole wider audience or fan base. However, I do believe she belongs on TV. But like u said, if it works for her...fine. Me and a couple of guy friends were discussing how she is ok looking(would hit it in a minute) and for her to still remain single after BP...something's going on.

Should Aniston have stuck with television? Actress hopes audiences will 'Just Go With It,' but she's forever Rachel Green to many Jennifer Aniston stars with Adam Sandler in romantic comedy "Just Go With It." But is she still just playing Rachel Green from "Friends"? By Michael Ventre TODAYshow.com contributor TODAYshow.com contributor COMMENTARY Once she was one-sixth of “Friends.” Now she is 100 percent Jennifer Aniston. Yet in the public’s mind, the math gets a little fuzzy. Movie fans will see her in the romantic comedy “Just Go With It” alongside Adam Sandler. Some will look at her and see Rachel Green, her character on the megahit NBC series. Others can put a little distance between her and Rachel. (TODAYshow.com is a part of msnbc.com, which is a joint venture between Microsoft and NBC Universal.) But there don't seem to be many who can completely separate Aniston from Rachel. And that’s the rub. “I think she’s playing the same character from ‘Friends’ over and over again,” said Chris Nashawaty, senior writer for Entertainment Weekly. “It’s a tricky thing with her movies. She’s made a bunch, they do OK at the box office, and some do really well. The problem is most don’t get great reviews. I suspect this Adam Sandler movie will be one of those. Don't miss these Entertainment stories Sony Pictures Should Aniston have stuck with television? Former "Friends" star is hoping that audiences will "Just Go With It," but she'll forever be Rachel Green to many. “The bottom line is whether she’s a good actress. I would say she’s a good TV actress. She obviously had a role on ‘Friends’ that was iconic, a character that people related to and was beloved. But you can’t reproduce that character over and over again or you’ll get diminishing returns.” Story: Jennifer Aniston turned down 'SNL' for 'Friends' “Friends” ended in 2004. Before it did, Aniston made two films that suggested first-rate things were ahead in her big-screen future. She was Joanna, love interest to Ron Livingston’s Peter, in writer-director Mike Judge’s brilliant 1999 spoof of white-collar cubicle angst, “Office Space.” And she earned sparkling reviews in “The Good Girl,” a 2002 comedy-drama about a store clerk seeking love. But lately she has appeared in a series of romantic-themed pictures that drift back to Rachel territory, such as “Rumor Has It ...,” “The Break-Up,” “Management,” “Love Happens” and “The Switch,” with varying degrees of commercial success and almost universally tepid critical reaction. She has taken some chances in between. She starred alongside Clive Owen in “Derailed,” a 2005 thriller. She had a role in Nicole Holofcener’s 2006 ensemble piece, “Friends With Money.” (“I found her lovely and fun to work with,” said the director.) She co-starred with Owen Wilson in “Marley & Me,” in which both took a backseat to a nutty pooch. And last year she and Gerard Butler frolicked in the action comedy “The Bounty Hunter.” Yet for the most part — for better or worse — it’s been difficult for her to shake the shadow of Rachel. In some ways, that’s a positive because Aniston banked plenty of good will during the 10 seasons she appeared on “Friends.” “You know why people pay so much attention to her is that we’re really rooting for her,” said Grae Drake, film critic for movies.com. “Jennifer Aniston has so many people on her side (because of) ‘Friends.’ She’s so funny and talented that we want her to be good. It kills us when she’s not good, or she’s not in a vehicle that’s good for her. I really take her work personally.” No more rom-coms! But even someone who admires the actress as much as Drake does would like to see her stretch a bit. “Personally, I’m done seeing her in romantic comedies,” she said. “I think that’s also Jennifer Lopez’s problem. I’m done with these romantic comedy cookie-cutter things. I think she (Aniston) should go outside the box. “Let’s get her in an old-school horror film. Put her in something unexpected.” Some of the issue centers on any actor’s penchant for playing themselves, or bringing significant amounts of themselves to roles. Wendy Girard, one of the top acting coaches in Los Angeles, said that is natural and understandable. “Every actor has to bring himself or herself to a role because that’s all you’ve got,” she said. “You’re the instrument. But if you study and work hard and develop, then you get into your capacity to explore character. Not just the charming social side of your personality but the vast dimensions of all of humanity that are encompassed in literature. That’s where training comes in. “In a feature film, you start from scratch. You’re creating a new character. With a TV series it’s the same thing over and over, just different situations.” The opinions of average movie fans on Aniston’s career and talents vary: From Rick Suvalle of Los Angeles: “I loved her on ‘Friends,’ but she can’t pick a movie to star in to save her life.” From Elizabeth Korecky of Newport News, Va.: “Personally I prefer her in more serious roles than the comedy stuff she’s doing a lot lately. She simply doesn’t have a comedic face.” From Carol Strahlendorf Vega of West Milford, N.J.: “Like her, don’t love her. I think she is an OK actress, not award-winning — but entertaining in the right role.” From Joan Schlecter Gruskin of Southwest Ranches, Fla.: "Saw the worst movie in a long time: ‘The Bounty Hunter.’ She starred in it. Really awful." After “Just Go With It,” fans who want to see her embark on a radically different career path may have to wait a bit. She has two more comedies set for release. One is “Horrible Bosses,” in which she stars opposite Jason Bateman in a story about three friends who conspire to kill their mean managers when they realize it’s the only way to true happiness; and the other is “Wanderlust,” in which she and Paul Rudd play a couple who seek out a more bohemian lifestyle. Bottom line: The movie jury is still out on Jennifer Aniston. Said EW’s Nashawaty: “She’s making safe choices, but they may end up being bad choices. She needs to show she can do something else.” Michael Ventre is a frequent contributor to TODAYshow.com.

The arrival and hearing:

Judge CRUSHES Lohan -- 'Don't Push Your Luck!' 2/9/2011 2:07 PM PST by TMZ Staff Lindsay Lohan was just remanded into custody -- following a STRONG warning from Judge Keith Schwartz -- "You're no different than anyone else ... please don't push your luck." Moments after Lohan entered a not guilty plea in her felony theft case -- the judge came down on her like a ton of bricks ... telling her "things will be different" this time around because she's on the hook for a felony. During the hearing, Judge Schwartz said Lindsay's lawyer, Shawn Chapman Holley, and prosecutor Danette Meyers, were going to meet to possibly reach a plea bargain. Lohan -- alongside attorney Holley -- was then remanded into custody ... and is currently being booked. Judge Schwartz set her bail at $20,000 -- but warned, "If you violate the law, I will remand you and there will be NO BAIL." The judge also revoked Lindsay's probation in the DUI case and set bail at $20,000 -- so total bail is $40,000. Lohan was also ordered to refrain from contacting the jewelry store during the case, after Meyers said someone had sent the store owners flowers, which kind of freaked them out. UPDATE 2:48 PM PT: Lindsay has posted bail.

Charlie Sheen: 'I'll Pay the Crew' 2/9/2011 12:30 PM PST by TMZ Staff Charlie Sheen has notified members of the "Two and a Half Men" crew that he will pay a portion of their salaries for the two weeks the show has been down ... if CBS and Warner Bros. agree to pay the remaining portion. TMZ has confirmed ... Charlie is saying he is ready to come back to work next week to complete the season. We're told Charlie is upset that Warner Bros. and show creator Chuck Lorre have not offered to pay the crew for the downtime, so he's made an offer to pay 1/3 of the crew salaries if Warner Bros. and CBS each pay 1/3 as well. A CBS exec tells TMZ ... no one on the show is ready to go back to work on Monday. We're told under the best of circumstances the show will come back at the end of the month, assuming Charlie can handle it. And the CBS exec adds, no one has asked the network to pay 1/3 of the crew salaries for the downtime. A Warner Bros. exec would not address Charlie's financial offer but told us ... "We sincerely hope that Charlie's rehab is going well. We hope that he is healthy in the very near future and we look forward to the return of production of 'Two and a Half Men.'"

Great analogy about Dana Plato..but her career was over long before she got put in the slammer and eventually succumbed to her demons (not in the prime of her career). She only had Different Strokes. Lindsay has more credits...the experts constantly say she has more talent and was very marketable as well...not just a TV actress with one hit show. She was in Mean Girls and Freaky Friday...with decent performances. There are directors/producers out there who are still willing to put her in movies(Tarantino admitted it...Joel Silver, Robert Rodriguez (Machette) Sure she may have to take a pay cut for indie flicks and get some heavy insurance...but that doesn't mean she's done. She also can do Dancing With The Stars or a Reality show (Dr. Drew)...don't forget those werer actual offers she had gotten. So it's a much wider media base then what Dana Plato had during her time...if she was still alive today, she probably would've wound up on Celebrity Rehab.

Sadly...I don't think her career is over. Even if she goes to jail, even if she continues this deviant behavior. Someone will step in and still hire her...indie projects. But she will be hired. It's a business where having a prison record, drug problems, don't matter. She's also young. I have to repeat what I hear from my co-workers when they say, look at RDJ and Charlie Sheen.

Nancy Grace Can't Believe Lindsay Lohan Isn't in Jail By Rob Shuter Posted Feb 9th 2011 11:31AM Nancy Grace may not be surprised that Lindsay Lohan isn't behind bars right this second, but that doesn't mean she isn't infuriated by it. The 'Swift Justice' host and no-nonsense prosecutor tells me there's a "two-tier justice system" in place that affords celebs with a whole different set of rules. "I believe celebrities get into so much trouble because they think the rules don't apply to them," Nancy said. "It think it becomes instinct that they can do, say whatever they want, and there's no repercussions." The 'Mean Girls' star may actually have bitten off more than she can chew this time, and she's being charged with felony grand theft for allegedly swiping a $2,500 necklace from a jewelry store last month. A couple weeks after taking the necklace, a friend dropped it off at a police station, and Lindsay's dad told me he thought she was loaned the merchandise. Sketchy! "She's on video! She goes in the store without the necklace. She comes out with the necklace," she said, amazed. "I don't know about you, but when I make a return, it's directly to Target. I usually don't send it to the LAPD!" Nancy said the fact that Lindsay wasn't immediately "thrown down on the asphalt" outside the store and prosecuted within days of the incident is directly tied to her being a celebrity. "Let's just say you send a black girl into that same jewelry story, or an educated person or a poor person, they come away with a $2,500 necklace, honey, and they would be thrown down on the asphalt and dragged by their feet back into the store and prosecuted." If convicted, LiLo could be sent to a California state prison with a maximum sentence of three years behind bars. She's currently on supervised probation for a past drunk driving conviction, and the judge overseeing her case told her in October that she would be sent to jail for 180 days if she violated her probation rules before her next court appearance, which is set for Feb. 25.

Well, when your husband wears eyeliner and confesses to enjoying parting with the boys...c'mon, Ashlee.

Surprise! :4biggrin:

Lindsay Lohan To Be Charged With Felony Tomorrow 33 minutes ago by TMZ Staff TMZ has learned ... Lindsay Lohan will be charged with felony grand theft tomorrow. Sources connected with the case tell us ... the single count of felony grand theft will be filed at Airport Court in L.A. Wednesday morning. Lindsay will be arraigned at 1:30 PM. She must be present for the hearing. Lindsay will be charged with stealing a $2,500 necklace from an L.A. jewelry store. If convicted, she could be sent to California State prison.

L.A. district attorney holds off on charging Lohan 'Absolutely nothing will be filed today,' D.A.'s office tells E! News By Josh Grossberg E!online Lindsay Lohan can breathe easy...for now. E! News has confirmed the Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office will not be charging the troubled starlet today with felony theft for allegedly swiping a $2,500 necklace—which means mom Dina Lohan, can go back to fuming over "Glee" dissing her on its post-Super Bowl broadcast. So where's the Lindsay case stand? "Absolutely nothing will be filed today," D.A. spokeswoman Jane Robison tells E! News. Right now, longtime Lohan nemesis Danette Meyers (who prosecuted the actress's DUI case) is still going over the evidence presented last week by the LAPD. If Meyers agrees with police that a felony charge is warranted then a criminal complaint will be filed. But because Lohan would be considered a nonviolent offender, the D.A. would not dispatch police to take her into custody. Instead, Team Lohan would would either negotiate a surrender or prosecutors would just set an arraignment date for her to appear. .Over the weekend, Lohan attorney Shawn Chapman Holley issued a statement saying, "We vehemently deny these allegations, and if charges are filed, we will fight them in court, not in the press." Meanwhile, sources close to the Lohan family seem to be in denial about the seriousness of the alleged felony, which carries a maximum three-year state prison sentence. "No one [in the family] really thinks she's going to get charged," said the family insider. "They believe she didn't steal the necklace. They think it's a non-case." After all, mom Dina has more importaint things to fixate on, like getting dissed on "Glee" when on last night's episode Katie Couric branded Jane Lynch's Sue Sylvester the "Loser of the Year," besting Dina for the honor. That's criminally funny. —Reporting by Claudia Rosenbaum and Katie Rhames

Dina Lohan fights back: 'Glee' writers 'need to be nice' Show pokes fun at Lindsay's mom during post-Super Bowl episode Dina Lohan is not pleased with "Glee" for first making fun of daughter Lindsay, and now her directly.By Natalie Finn and Katie Rhames E!online updated 39 minutes ago 2011-02-08T00:41:25 Super Bowl Sunday never seems to go well for the Lohan family. A year after a perceived slight from the E-Trade baby, the much hyped post-Super Bowl episode of "Glee" included an actual dig at Dina Lohan. After a cheerleading stunt gone wrong, Katie Couric informs Jane Lynch's Sue Sylvester that she beat out Lindsay Lohan's mom and her dog, "Sparky Lohan," to make the list of the world's biggest losers. Well, she didn't just beat Dina. She also beat out Tiger Woods, the economy and 9 percent unemployment. Considering this isn't the first time "Glee" has winked at the zeitgeist with a Lohan insult, did mama Dina's claws really come out this time? "The show has targeted everyone from gays to lesbians, Asians, disabled and each other...several groups are going after the producers including mothers' groups," Dina exclusively tells E! News. "It's a shame as the dance numbers are amazing, but the writers need to be nice and more creative as opposed to being hurtful. They are sending the wrong message to the youth that are watching. Oh, and I must get a 'fifth' dog named Sparky...as far as Katie Couric is concerned, she has a short memory when the tabloids were trashing her a few years ago—and she's a mom!" Well, trashing someone for not pulling the CBS Evening News out of third place isn't exactly the same thing, but...OK. Lindsay was, according to her mom, really upset after Gwyneth Paltrow, playing a substitute Spanish teacher on "Glee," taught her class phrases that meant "Lindsay Lohan is totally crazy, right?" and "How many times has Lindsay Lohan been to rehab?" Last year, E-Trade's Super Bowl commercial featured a milkaholic baby named Lindsay, prompting the starlet (whose Cannes-to-court-to-Betty-Ford legal troubles were still ahead of her) to sue for $100 million, picking such a high figure presumably to make a point.

Lindsay Lohan Facing Three Years in State Prison Over Jewelry Theft By Hollie McKay Published February 05, 2011 |FoxNews.com Lindsay Lohan hit headlines (again) last week when she was accused of stealing a $2500 necklace from a Venice boutique, which she claimed she simply borrowed and her stylist forgot to return, but the matter is turning into something much bigger than a mere miscommunication. Lohan will be charged with felony grand theft as early as next week, according to TMZ, and faces a maximum three years in a state prison if convicted. Los Angeles Criminal Defense Attorney, Steve Cron, told us she may very well be prosecuted over the incident - although it is hardly likely she would be sentenced to a full three years. "There is a likelihood. It seems to me that she got caught stealing that necklace and it appears that somebody talked her into returning it a week later and had someone drop it off but it was too little too late. She had already stolen it, so I think she will get prosecuted," Cron surmised. "It's unlikely that she is going to get 3 years in state prison because although she's screwed up repeatedly on probation, but she certainly can get a lot more time in county jail. Judge Fox could give her 6 months for violating probation in Beverly Hills and another judge who hears the case on grand theft could decide to send her for more time in county jail or he could send her to state prison. It's more likely that she is going to go to an extended period in county jail. It wouldn't be 30 or 60 days, it's going to be a substantially longer sentence than that." However, Lohan's camp is maintaining that she is absolutely innocent. "We vehemently deny these allegations and, if charges are filed, we will fight them in court, not in the press," Lohan's attorney Shawn Chapman Holley told TMZ in a statement. "This whole story is crazy. $2500 is tip money to Lindsay, if she wanted the necklace that badly she would have bought it," said our insider. "She's going to get to the bottom of this - it wasn't stolen." Deidre Behar contributed to this report.

Damn. Lindsay Could Skate Because of Jewelry Store Delay 2/3/2011 9:30 AM PST by TMZ Staff The jewelry store at the center of the Lindsay Lohan necklace investigation may have compromised any prosecution by waiting more than a day before calling the cops ... sources tell TMZ. The owner of Kamofie & Company claims Lindsay walked out with the $2,500 necklace on January 22, yet she did not inform the LAPD until the 23rd. Our sources say the jewelry store owner claims she tried contacting Lindsay's people on the 22nd to ask them to return the item, but couldn't reach anyone. Here's the snag ... the owner simply could have walked down the street and knocked at Lindsay's door. Lindsay claims the store loaned her the necklace. Fact is ... jewelry store owners have thrown themselves at Lindsay, asking her to wear their stuff. The picture shows Lindsay on January 7, posing with another jewelry owner who gifted her an expensive necklace. In order to charge Lindsay, the D.A. must prove she had a specific intention to permanently take the item as she walked out the door.

Lindsay Tipped Off to Search Warrant 52 minutes ago by TMZ Staff -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sources connected with the Lindsay Lohan necklace caper tell TMZ ... they believe Lindsay was tipped off after the judge signed the search warrant yesterday ... and she returned the jewelry before her house could be raided. We've learned the warrant was signed by Judge Katherine Mader at 3:45 PM Tuesday. The LAPD was making plans to execute the warrant -- which authorized cops to search for the necklace at Lindsay's home in Venice, CA. But somehow -- before the search was conducted -- Lindsay's stylist showed up at an LAPD substation and returned the $2,500 necklace. Sources connected with the case tell us ... they believe someone told Lindsay the warrant was in play. Otherwise, they say, why would she have her stylist go to the LAPD to return the jewelry rather than the jewelry store? Our sources believe Lindsay tried making a preemptive move, but we're told ultimately returning the jewelry won't be a factor in deciding whether to prosecute her.

J.Lo Is Furious That 'Idol' Is All About Steven Tyler By Rob Shuter Posted Feb 1st 2011 05:40PM Who predicted 'American Idol' would be in deep trouble without Simon Cowell at the helm? Me, you, everybody, that is until Steven Tyler stepped up to breathe new life into the decade-old series, thrilling just about everyone -- save for Miss Jennifer Lopez. "This was meant to be Jennifer's big comeback," an insider complains to me. "The entire re-branding of the show was built around her, but now it's all about Steven 24/7." While Jennifer's the one normally lavished with attention, I'm hearing she's getting annoyed with all the people asking her about the Aerosmith legend. Snarked my source: "She's mystified at how this happened and has made it very clear to the producers that the cameras need to spend a little more time adoring Jennifer's favorite idol -- herself!" And although it may be a little too soon for 'Idol' to be congratulating themselves on another season well done, the doom and gloom theories that this would be the show's last year on the air are all but silenced. "The show has experienced year-to-year declines of about 10 percent for the last several seasons now, so everyone expected ratings to drop," a TV insider tells me. "The only question was how much they drop. And although the show did drop, it still produced huge numbers easily beating all its competition. Last week's episode was actually up from last Thursday's episode by nearly 18 percent, and was down only 9 percent from the equivalent episode last year." At the end of the day, it's shaping up that Steven has saved this show. Word of mouth about him and the quality of singers is getting stronger and stronger ever week, and so far he's even managed to get us to forget the departure of Simon Cowell. Sorry, Jennifer, we still miss Paula. Follow Rob on Twitter for Scoop All Day Long!

David Arquette Checks Out of Rehab By PopEater Staff Posted Jan 30th 2011 06:42PM Nearly one month after entering himself into a rehab facility to treat problems with "alcohol and other issues," David Arquette has checked himself out. Arquette completed his treatment on Sunday. "He has competed his treatment and has left," his rep tells PEOPLE. Another source told PEOPLE that Arquette is "in great spirits. He's feeling good and he's ready to move forward." Arquette had checked into rehab at the beginning of January. The actor moved into a live-in rehab facility to address an alcohol problem following a New Year's Eve party at Arquette & Beacher's Madhouse Theater, located at the Roosevelt Hotel in Los Angeles. According to its website, the venue features a "Flying Midget bartender" and had the "atmosphere of a circus." A source close to Arquette told TMZ at the time that he was seeking help because it was "the right thing to do for his family." PEOPLE quoted another insider who confirms the star entered rehab for "drinking and depression, not hard drugs." Courteney Cox came out in support of her estranged husband after his decision. "I really admire David and his choice to take charge and better his life," the actress told PEOPLE earlier this month. "I love and support him." Arquette checked himself into an unidentified facility over the holiday weekend following months of erratic behavior that included several revealing conversations with friend and shock jock Howard Stern. Many of the revelations to Stern included intimate details of his love life -- or lack of a love life -- with Cox.

Charlie Sheen Checks In to Rehab 42 minutes ago by TMZ Staff Charlie Sheen voluntarily checked himself in to an undisclosed rehab facility earlier today ... and his show "Two and a Half Men" has been placed on indefinite "hiatus" while he undergoes treatment. "Two and a Half Men" producers released a statement saying, "Due to Charlie Sheen’s decision to enter a rehabilitation center, CBS, Warner Bros. Television and executive producer Chuck Lorre are placing “Two and a Half Men” on production hiatus." The statement continues, "We are profoundly concerned for his health and well-being, and support his decision." Sheen's publicist tells us, "He is most grateful to all who have expressed their concern." As TMZ previously reported, Sheen had a briefcase of cocaine delivered to his mansion during a 36-hour bender earlier this week ... and was hospitalized early Thursday morning for a hiatal hernia.

$cieno chaperones..... Minions. :4biggrin: Who aren't allowed to be photographed.

Wouldn't you be, if you were married to the one who shall not be named? :4biggrin: