Paul & Stella McCartney clan

[MC 1]

She had more like a... uh... Page 3 like career as a model b4 the leg. 

I never knew that! He married a Page 3 "model"???

[Freckles 79]

I feel like giving Stella a big hug in celebration of her dad kicking that women to the curb

Except, I hear that Stella is quite the bitch, too. Not as bad as Heather, of course. But quite unpleasant...

[colorine 26]

Modeling? What happened to all her charity work? She will be a popular as Camilla.

[princess 1,712]

I feel like giving Stella a big hug in celebration of her dad kicking that women to the curb

Except, I hear that Stella is quite the bitch, too. Not as bad as Heather, of course. But quite unpleasant...

Yeah, she may cut me - but I'd still give her the hug

[cydonia 0]

NY Daily News

 

Day stripper: Sir Paul's wife in porn-pix report

 

Paul's McCartney's estranged wife posed for hard-core pornographic pictures in Germany before she became a famous fashion model, a London newspaper reported today, accompanying its story with some racy photographs.

According to the London Sun, Heather Mills "was snapped in a string of lurid scenes for a hard-core German book" back in 1988.

 

One photo in the book shows Mills naked and smothered in baby oil as she performs a sex act on a male porn star, the paper wrote. In other pictures, Mills appears to act out bondage scenes with whips, handcuffs and edible underwear.

 

The paper said many of the images "are too explicit to print in a family newspaper," but it posted several shots of a topless Mills on its Web site.

 

Mills, 38, and McCartney, 63, announced last month that they were separating after four years of marriage. The couple has a 2-year-old daughter.

[taco 0]

Some of the pictures here -> http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2006250730,00.html

 

Highlights [lowlights?] from the article

 

 

She was once even asked on a US chat show if she had ever been a prostitute, which she denied.

 

Days ago The Sun told how Heather was a would-be escort girl who dated rich Arabs behind the back of first hubby Alfie Karmal.

 

He said: “I caught her out lying over a job interview, which turned out to be an interview with an escort agency. Heather claimed she didn’t know it was an escort agency and said she thought she would just be showing clients around London.

 

“Under that beautiful, caring facade was a manipulative, callous and cold woman.”

 

 

Many of the images are too explicit to print in a family newspaper.

 

One shot shows Heather naked and smothered in baby oil as she performs a sex act on a nude male porn star. The curly-haired man is then photographed performing an act on her with the help of a sex toy.

 

In other shots Heather appears to act out bondage scenes with whips, handcuffs and edible underwear.

 

Dressed in red stockings, suspenders and a corset — and with long red-painted nails — she looks like the madam of a sleazy brothel.

 

She is also seen smearing herself and the male co-star with whipped cream and baby oil. In some snaps her nipples are covered with lipstick.

 

In other scenes, Heather and the man appear to have sex and perform sex acts while watching themselves in a mirror. And in yet more, Heather ends up naked during a game of strip poker.

 

I had to laugh at the Sun calling itself a "family" publication".

[Hoyaheel 1,874]

Nice find/plant by his lawyers and PR people--this won't look good in the custody battle

[Ronnie83 0]

Nice find/plant by his lawyers and PR people--this won't look good in the custody battle

Absolutley, but if this is true...Bea would be better off with Paul. I can't say for certain,( trying to give Heather at least a small benefit of the doubt) he just seems to be the more concerned parent.

[princess 1,712]

I think I just got the warm fuzzies

[colorine 26]

Paul was stupid not to investigate this woman before he married her. He needs to pay her off now and get rid of her. Poor Bea.

[princess 1,712]

I'm betting he knew. I'm betting he wants custody of the daughter so he's the one (or his peeps are) leaking to the press.

[Freckles 79]

Yeah. He probably knew before but had the hubris - like so many men - to think, she might have been a gold-digging whore before, but NOW she loves me, just me, for my manly self, not for my money. Sad. For all that we mock someone like Britney for being dumb and making bad choices, I think that someone like Heather is far more disgusting. I do believe that Britney is well-meaning and misguided, whereas Heather has a cold-blooded, strategic side that sends shiver up my spine. I hope this divorce ruins Heather for life, and people turn from her in revulsion, even if she gets awarded lots of money.

[poofball 0]

I live in Europe (former Eastern bloc, but Europe nonetheless) and a couple of years ago the BBC ran an 60-minutes-ish expose (WAY more incendiary than your average A&E Biography) on Heather Mills pre-Paul. Given the allegations of that program and what I've read independently since, I have zero doubt about how calculating and shrill this beeyotch is. (Not to mention a complete douche bag porny ho). I am SO Team Paul on all of this.

[taco 0]

Team Paul I just wish paul was "team paul", I fear he may be Team heatherI hope this is him coming to his senses like you say.

[bittermuch? 0]

I'm not sure why everyone hates Heather so much, but they sure do. The people headline: "Why Paul Dumped Heather." Not "why did the marriage fail" or "what went wrong." "Why Paul Kicked Heather to the Curb." So far I've seen that she's not above whoring herself for money, but that would cover 99.999% of all the female celebs we discuss, and 99.9% of the males. Paul was the Cute Beatle, not the Principled Beatle.

[poofball 0]

I'm not sure why everyone hates Heather so much, but they sure do.  The people headline:  "Why Paul Dumped Heather."  Not "why did the marriage fail" or "what went wrong."  "Why Paul Kicked Heather to the Curb."  So far I've seen that she's not above whoring herself for money, but that would cover 99.999% of all the female celebs we discuss, and 99.9% of the males.  Paul was the Cute Beatle, not the Principled Beatle.

Yeah, but she's way more disingenously calculating than a lot of other annoying people, plus snooty to boot. BAD combination, IMO. She comes from very modest roots (which would be a positive if she was pleasant), stabs people in the back and climbs over their bodies to move on past, innocently claims she basically had never heard many Paul McCartney songs (like...really, oh please ) and is really all about helping the rest of the world ('scuse me, move aside, oh look, wave, there's a photog!)

[bittermuch? 0]

I'm sure she's far more annoying when she's given more coverage. I don't know enough about her to hate her. Yet. For some reason I give the benefit of the doubt to people who at least appear to be trying to do good. So many celebs don't even bother pretending (*cough* Aniston *cough*).

Edited June 5, 2006 by bittermuch?

[MC 1]

I don't know enough about her to hate her.  Yet.  For some reason I give the benefit of the doubt to people who at least appear to be trying to do good.

I hope you're right. For me, I was kind of pissed when she stepped right into Princess Diana's place with the landmines. It's not like Heather lost her leg because of a landmine, but I can guarantee you there are a lot of people who think that! Didn't she know that by marrying a Beatle she'd always be #2? MAYBE if she stayed in the background and did her good works for a few decades, she could have earned her own genuine reputation as a do-gooder. We'll see how it all shakes out.....

[nsmallaz 0]

How much money does Heather want?

[Hoyaheel 1,874]

How much money does Heather want?

This was in Cindy Adams' column today (6/6/06) in the NY Post:

 

HEATHER Mills (temporarily) McCartney shopping her mouth to U.S. TV. She's been pitched to Larry King. Although both sides of the pond chased this interview, he has the edge because she's previously done his show.

 

 

It's the last thing Sir Paul wants. He does not want his personal life dished. On the table now is 50 million pounds. Firm. But with it comes the caveat of silence. She must keep shut this yap that let us all know how she wasn't the slightest interested in Paul's money. Right. But she sure as hell cares about her money. She's looking for $500 mil.

He desperately wants her shut up. So, since she's refusing to go away quietly, she has to talk fast. Nail interviews on the double before the final settlement because talking . . . or, rather, talking more . . . is, besides their baby, her strongest bargaining chip.

 

With all the bread coming her way, she still wants more. This nice lady also plans to cash in on her position. To work again as a model. Do the runway. The collections in Paris and Milan. The tents in New York. Agents are negotiating to stick her back on fashion runways. She has a title. She has money. She has fame. She has a handicap. She has a need for attention. What better magnet for anyone who has to spotlight their schmattas.

[nsmallaz 0]

She has been listening to a lot of Kanye West

[taco 0]

Heather denies 'porno past'

By This is London

6 June 2006

Lawyers for Heather Mills McCartney have denied she had ever appeared in a "hard core porn" photo shoot following allegations in a national newspaper.

 

The lawyers said the photos, which appeared in the Sun, and which showed Lady McCartney in various poses with an unidentified male model, were taken for a "lover's guide" and were not part of what the paper claimed was her "filthy past".

 

They denied the estranged wife of Sir Paul had a "porno past" which she kept hidden from the former Beatle.

 

In a letter to the newspaper's editor Rebekah Wade, they said the photo shoot took place 20 years ago for a sex and relationship guide.

 

The letter said: "This photo shoot, undertaken approximately 20 years ago, was for the purpose of a 'lover's guide' to caring relationships and instructive sex in the same way as are many other books on the market.

 

"The photo shoot was not pornographic or for the purposes of gratification of the viewer."

 

The letter said it was widely known that Lady McCartney had posed nude while working as a model in the past and that Sir Paul was aware of her work.

 

The couple announced last month that they were separating after four years of marriage.

 

It has been reported that Lady McCartney could receive up to £200million in a divorce settlement.

 

A spokesperson for The Sun said: "Heather Mills McCartney's comments are laughable.

 

"The Sun was only able to publish a few images of the 172 printed in 'Die Freuden der Liebe' due to the obscene and pornographic nature of the photographs.

 

"Far from being an instruction manual, the book contains not a word of text."

 

 

 

 

 

they aren't fooling anybody

[colorine 26]

Her 15 minutes of fame is over. A runway model? Talk show host? What happened to all that charity work?

[Ronnie83 0]

Larry King?! I guess she missed Oprah's call. BTW, poofball, douche bag porny ho is my new favorite expression!

[poofball 0]

Porn pal to tell of romp

Trouble at Mills ... Heather and

co-star - before 'doing it for real'

By VICTORIA NEWTON - The Sun, UK

Showbiz Editor

 

LADY Mucca’s partner in porn is set to tell the world they had passionate sex over and over again after the cameras stopped clicking. The curly-haired male model is hoping to bag thousands of pounds by selling his story of how he did it for real with Heather Mills. His move will heap yet more shame on Sir Paul McCartney’s estranged wife — mother of his two-year-old daughter Beatrice.

 

Yesterday it emerged her divorce settlement from the former Beatle could be slashed. Lawyers for 63-year-old Paul are bound to cite her pornographic past as grounds for his payout — until now estimated at £200million — to be reduced. Heather, 38, suffered a THIRD knock as it was revealed top shelf men’s magazines are preparing to publish some of the filthiest images from her photo shoot with the male model. She is already reeling after The Sun’s world exclusive on Monday, in which we told how she “starred” in a German hard core porn book in 1988. Heather has insisted the book was merely a Lovers’ Guide-style self-help manual for partners. But the pictures have no accompanying words — and her claims have been widely ridiculed. An angry-looking Heather turned up at Paul’s country spread in Peasmarsh, East Sussex, yesterday — accompanied by her lawyer. It was the first time she has shown her face since the scandal broke. Paul was not there. He was at his home in St John’s Wood, North London. Heather, who drove up in a black Mercedes 4x4, stayed less than 15 minutes before speeding away — apparently in a rage. An onlooker said: “Heather drove right up to the farmhouse. She left in a right state.”

 

Passers-by quizzed by The Sun on Britain’s streets yesterday were united in believing Heather’s photo shoot was pornographic, NOT educational. Shown pages of the German book, called The Joys of Love, catering worker Madeline Johnson said: “It’s just too rude to be a guide — the pictures show everything.” Madeline, 30, of Clapton, East London, added: “It would have some sort of text if it was meant to be educational. It’s definitely porn.” Journalist Ruth Lumley, 26, of Brighton, said: “Blimey, I’ve never come across a ‘sex education’ book that has whipped cream in it.” Facilities manager John Bertram, 52, of Manchester, said: “It would need more text and less in the way of edible undies and thongs. In this situation Heather is definitely a porn star.” Printer Andrew Love, 42, of Basildon, Essex, declared the book “fairly hard core”. And engineer Stuart Lye, 31, of Chingford, Essex, said: “After ten pages it’s clear you’re not going to learn much with all these whips and things.”